Sample Deliverable · Vessel Performance Audit

Quarterly Performance Audit Report

An illustrative single-vessel audit demonstrating the structure, depth, and analytical framework Navallogic Solutions delivers to clients. Real engagements follow this same format, sized to your fleet and scope.

Document type Vessel Performance Audit
Period covered Q1 2026 (Jan–Mar)
Vessels analysed 1
Reporting team Navallogic Solutions
This is an illustrative sample report. All vessel particulars, performance figures, and findings shown below are fictional and constructed for demonstration purposes only. They do not represent any actual client engagement. Real client work remains strictly confidential under engagement-level NDAs.
Section 01

Vessel Particulars

The following section captures the vessel identifying data and the operating envelope referenced throughout the analysis.

Vessel name
MT Sample Vessel
IMO number
9XXXXXX (redacted)
Vessel type
Aframax Crude Oil Tanker
DWT
109,800 metric tonnes
Year built
2014 (12 years old)
Main engine
MAN B&W 6S60ME-C8 · 13,560 kW MCR
Design speed (laden)
14.5 knots @ 75% MCR
Trade pattern
Mediterranean — Northwest Europe (~60% EU waters)

Data sources reviewed: 92 noon reports (Jan–Mar 2026), 38 bunker delivery notes, 24 voyage records, complete CMMS export covering planned maintenance and condition data over the period, and shore-based sea trial baseline from 2014.

Section 02

Executive Summary

Q1 Fuel consumed
3,142 MT
HFO equivalent
Speed–power deviation
+4.6%
Above baseline
CII attained (projected)
C / D
2026 year-end
EU ETS exposure
~€218K
Q1 estimated

Key observations

  • Hull and propeller condition is deteriorating. Speed–power deviation has increased from +2.1% in October 2025 to +4.6% in March 2026, consistent with progressive hull fouling on the lower hull and propeller leading edge.
  • CII trajectory is at risk. At current operating pattern, projected year-end attained CII places the vessel on the C/D rating boundary. A mid-year corrective action is required to avoid a D rating.
  • EU ETS exposure is material and rising. With 60% EU-waters trading and 100% surrender obligation from January 2026, annual EUA cost on current operating pattern is approximately €1.24M if the operational pattern is unchanged.
  • Auxiliary boiler showing efficiency degradation. Steam consumption per cargo operation has increased 8% over the period. Recommend boiler economiser inspection at next port call.
Section 03

Performance Analysis

3.1 Speed–power deviation trend

The chart below shows the rolling 30-day mean speed–power deviation against the baseline curve established from 2014 sea trials. Weather correction has been applied per ISO 19030 methodology.

Speed–power deviation, rolling 30-day mean
% deviation from baseline · weather corrected · Oct 2025 — Mar 2026
+6% +4% +2% 0% −2% Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Action threshold (+4%) +4.6%
Monthly mean deviation
Above action threshold

Interpretation: Deviation has increased steadily over six months. The current level (+4.6%) is past the action threshold and consistent with progressive hull and propeller fouling. The acceleration in January–March suggests fouling has entered the rapid-growth phase rather than the slow accumulation phase.

3.2 Fuel consumption per nautical mile

Specific fuel consumption per nautical mile (laden)
kg HFO / nm · weather corrected · vessel speed normalised to 13.5 kn
218 221 224 228 232 236 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Baseline 215
Monthly mean
Approaching threshold
Beyond threshold

3.3 CII trajectory projection

Based on the operating pattern observed and projecting forward at current speed and trade mix, the vessel's year-end attained CII is projected to fall in the upper range of the C rating boundary, with non-trivial risk of crossing into D. Corrective action initiated by July 2026 (mid-year) would likely keep the vessel comfortably in C. Inaction would risk a D rating by year-end.

Scenario Action Projected attained CII Rating
Status quoNo action5.42C / D boundary
Mid-year hull cleaningIn-water cleaning + prop polish by July 20265.18C (safe)
Hull cleaning + 0.5 kn reductionAbove + reduce speed on selected ballast legs4.96C / B boundary
Section 04

Findings & Prioritised Actions

The findings below are ranked by combined financial impact and operational urgency. Each carries a quantified annual cost of inaction and a recommended timeline.

Finding 01 · Progressive hull and propeller fouling
High Priority

Speed–power deviation has increased from +2.1% to +4.6% over six months, consistent with progressive fouling on the lower hull and propeller leading edge. Specific fuel consumption per nm has correspondingly risen 9.8% above baseline. The deviation has now crossed the +4% action threshold.

Recommendation: Schedule in-water hull cleaning and propeller polishing within the next 60–90 days. Next planned dry dock is in Q2 2027, which is too late to recover the lost performance economically.

Cost of inaction
~$320K / year
EUA exposure added
~€46K / year
Recommended by
August 2026
Finding 02 · CII rating at risk of falling to D
High Priority

Projected year-end attained CII places the vessel on the C/D boundary. Without corrective action, there is a meaningful probability of receiving a D rating for 2026, which would trigger SEEMP Part III corrective action requirements and may affect commercial deployment under newer charter party terms.

Recommendation: Combine the hull cleaning action above with a selective speed reduction strategy on ballast legs where commercial schedules permit. Scenario modelling shows this combination reliably keeps the vessel inside C rating with margin for unforeseen events.

Commercial risk
D rating exposure
Mitigation cost
Combined with #01
Decision needed by
June 2026
Finding 03 · Auxiliary boiler efficiency degradation
Medium Priority

Steam consumption per cargo operation has trended upward 8% over the audit period. This is consistent with economiser tube fouling or burner combustion efficiency loss. Auxiliary fuel consumption during cargo operations directly affects both EU ETS exposure and CII attained.

Recommendation: Conduct boiler tube inspection and combustion analysis at next convenient port call. Carry out tube cleaning if visible fouling is observed.

Cost of inaction
~$28K / year
Resolution cost
~$4K (cleaning)
Recommended by
September 2026
Finding 04 · Noon report data quality improvements
Low Priority

Twelve noon reports over the audit period contained either missing or implausible sea state and wind speed entries. While the impact on operational decisions is limited, the data quality affects the precision of weather-corrected analysis and may affect verification under EU MRV reporting.

Recommendation: Refresher briefing for deck officers on noon report data entry. A standardised template would help.

Cost impact
Indirect
Resolution cost
Nil (training)
Recommended by
December 2026
Section 05

Consolidated Action Plan

The recommendations below consolidate the prioritised actions from Section 04 into a sequenced 12-month operational plan.

1

In-water hull cleaning and propeller polishing (by August 2026)

Schedule within next 60–90 days. Recovers approximately 3–4% of the lost speed–power performance and removes the immediate CII risk. Indicative cost $35–45K depending on port and weather window.

2

Selective ballast-leg speed reduction strategy (from July 2026)

Identify ballast legs where commercial schedules tolerate 0.3–0.5 knot reduction. Combined with #1, this reliably places year-end CII inside C rating. No capital cost.

3

Boiler economiser inspection and cleaning (September 2026)

Inspect at next convenient port; clean if fouling found. Approximately $4K and one day; recovers approximately $28K annually.

4

Monthly performance tracking continued through Q2–Q4 2026

Continue rolling 30-day speed–power and fuel-per-nm tracking. Updated CII projection delivered monthly. Re-audit at end of Q4 2026 to confirm recovery and inform 2027 planning.

5

Deck officer briefing on noon report standards (December 2026)

30-minute briefing during the next crew handover, with a standardised noon report data quality checklist. Improves data precision and MRV verification confidence.

This is what a Navallogic audit looks like.

If your fleet would benefit from this kind of structured, financially quantified analysis, let's talk. Initial consultations are without obligation and all engagement details remain confidential.

Request a consultation